Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 03/17/2009

  • Jargon or no, what has evolved to suit the requirements of grown-ups in an information-rich world is Occam's-razoresque: short sentences, simple vocabulary, logical progression. Parents who want their infants to learn language need a lot more than this. They need "motherese," that high-pitched sing-song dialect that puts everything in the third person and diminutizes it.

    tags: language, evolution, cogsci, grue

  • Forget the memory-boosting pills: In the future, powers of recall could be boosted with programs on a handheld PDA.

    tags: brain, memory, neuroethics, cogsci, grue

  • Defense attorneys are for the first time submitting a controversial next-generation lie-detection test as evidence in U.S. court.

    tags: fmri, lie-detection, neuroethics, cogsci, grue

  • Benjamin Libet’s experimental finding that decisions had in effect already been made before the conscious mind became aware of making them is both famous and controversial; now new research (published in a ‘Brief Communication’ in Nature Neuroscience by Chun Siong Soon, Marcel Brass, Hans-Jochen Heinze and John-Dylan Haynes) goes beyond it. Whereas the delay between decision and awareness detected by Libet lasted 500 milliseconds, the new research seems to show that decisions can be predicted up to ten seconds before the deciders are aware of having made up their minds. (Conscious Entities)

    tags: freewill, Libet, consciousness, neuroethics, cogsci

  • The experiments carried out by Benjamin Libet into the timing of conscious awareness (briefly described here ) have provoked, and go on provoking, a vast amount of discussion. His own theory of consciousness as a kind of field has received somewhat less attention; and the strange brain-cutting experiment he proposed to test it seems likely to remain unperformed for the foreseeable future. A large number of papers and discussions have been published: in 2004, Libet finally summarised his own account in the book 'Mind Time'. (consciousentities.com)

    tags: freewill, Libet, consciousness, mind, neuroethics, cogsci


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Monday, March 16, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 03/16/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Sunday, March 15, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 03/15/2009

  • People who believe that the mind can be replicated on a computer tend to explain the mind in terms of a computer. When theorizing about the mind, especially to outsiders but also to one another, defenders of artificial intelligence (AI) often rely on computational concepts. They regularly describe the mind and brain as the “software and hardware” of thinking, the mind as a “pattern” and the brain as a “substrate,” senses as “inputs” and behaviors as “outputs,” neurons as “processing units” and synapses as “circuitry,” to give just a few common examples. (The New Atlantis)

    tags: AI, computers, minds, cogsci, 150, grue


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Saturday, March 14, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 03/14/2009

  • In this interview we talked about neurophilosophy, which is an approach to philosophy of mind that gives high priority to incorporating the empiric findings of neuroscience. We also talk about the evolving relationship between philosophy and neuroscience. Churchland shares her enthusiasm for how the discoveries of neuroscience are changing the way we see ourselves as human beings. We also talked a little about the issues of reductionism that I first brought up in Episode 53.

    tags: neurophilosophy, Churchland, cogsci, grue


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 03/12/2009

  • Given only a small dose of oxytocin, individuals in a recent study found that their memory significantly improved. Not for historical dates, strings of digits, or bars of music, but for something much more significant: each other. (Seed)

    tags: oxytocin, memory, cogsci, neuroethics


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 03/11/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 03/10/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Monday, March 09, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 03/09/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Sunday, March 08, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 03/08/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Friday, March 06, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 03/06/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Wednesday, March 04, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 03/04/2009

  • What interests me is the question of how humans learn to live with uncertainty. Before the scientific revolution determinism was a strong ideal. Religion brought about a denial of uncertainty, and many people knew that their kin or their race was exactly the one that God had favored. They also thought they were entitled to get rid of competing ideas and the people that propagated them. How does a society change from this condition into one in which we understand that there is this fundamental uncertainty? How do we avoid the illusion of certainty to produce the understanding that everything, whether it be a medical test or deciding on the best cure for a particular kind of cancer, has a fundamental element of uncertainty?

    tags: heuristics, decision-making, cogsci


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Tuesday, March 03, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 03/03/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Monday, March 02, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 03/02/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Jonah Lehrer on FORA.tv

Friday, February 27, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 02/27/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Thursday, February 26, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 02/26/2009

  • Takahasi et al. show that experiencing envy at another person's success activates pain-related neural circuitry, whereas experiencing schadenfreude--delight at someone else's misfortune--activates reward-related neural circuitry. (Deric Bownds' MindBlog)

    tags: emotions, brains, cogsci


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 02/24/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Monday, February 23, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 02/23/2009

  • I will raise some questions about Tye’s argument. I will not challenge his claims about how Burgean intuitions apply to phenomenal concepts. Nor will I deny that those claims create problems for the phenomenal concept strategy, as it is usually formulated. Instead, I will suggest that there is a viable fallback position available to the phenomenal concept strategist: a revised strategy. (BrainPains)

    tags: phenomenal-concepts, consciousness, Tye, cogsci

  • Reading the minds of others can be darned hard. Are their intentions good, bad or indifferent? Whether we hold people accountable for their behaviour depends on the answer. Scientists probe questions like this through experiments. Philosophers traditionally appeal to intuition and argument. But now a young band of experimental philosophers are taking armchair philosophy to task, and digging for data. (All In The Mind - 21 February 2009)

    tags: intentionality, morality, cogsci, neuroethics

  • Furlong and Opfer do a nice set of experiments showing that we can be lured into making decisions by numbers that seem bigger than they really are. (Deric Bownds' MindBlog)

    tags: decision-making, cogsci


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Sunday, February 22, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 02/22/2009

  • One of the mysteries of gambling is that even when we should know we're going to lose, we somehow think we're going to win. Dr. Luke Clark, from the Department of Experimental Psychology at the University of Cambridge, may have discovered one of the reasons why. Using MRI, he studied brain activity in people gambling, looking particularly at "near misses" in which a loss seems close to a win. He found that the brain activated the same reward system that is activated in a real win, despite the fact that people report that these near misses are unpleasant. (CBC Radio | Quirks & Quarks | February 21, 2009)

    tags: addiction, brains, gambling, cogsci


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Thursday, February 19, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 02/19/2009

  • In our legal system, judges and juries have to assign responsibility for crimes and decide on appropriate punishments. A new imaging study reveals which area of the brain plays a key role in these cognitive processes. (Scientific American)

    tags: neuroethics, law, justice, moral-judgment, cogsci

  • Jerry Fodor has a lively and thoughtful review of Andy Clark's new book Supersizing the Mind in the latest issue of the London Review of Books. The paper is in effect a critique of the extended mind thesis, targeting Andy's and my joint paper "The Extended Mind", Andy's book, and my foreword to the book. Fodor makes two or three interesting objections to the extended mind thesis. (fragments of consciousness)

    tags: fodor, extended-mind, Chalmers, cogsci

  • According to a new study, our gut feelings can enhance the retrieval of explicitly encoded memories - those memories which we encode actively - and therefore lead to improved accuracy in simple decisions. The study, which is published online in Nature Neuroscience, also provides evidence that the retrieval of explicit and implicit memories involves distinct neural substrates and mechanisms. (Neurophilosophy)

    tags: neurophilosophy, neuroethics, cogsci, grue


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 02/18/2009

  • Given only a small dose of oxytocin, individuals in a recent study found that their memory significantly improved. Not for historical dates, strings of digits, or bars of music, but for something much more significant: each other. (Seed)

    tags: oxytocin, memory, cogsci

  • Tired of all that mushy nonsense that comes with Valentine's Day - the schmaltzy cards, the heart-shaped box of chocolates, the earnest whispers and secret nothings? It's about time someone took a cold, harsh look at love and expose it for what it really is: chemistry. That's right, forget about magic - when you boil it down, love is nothing more than a molecular stew, sloshing around inside our skulls. Researchers have begun to identify these compounds and understand exactly what they do.

    tags: vasopressin, brains, cogsci

  • Now the area of the brain which controls jealousy has been found, scientists have ­announced. (Mail Online)

    tags: emotion, brains, cogsci, jealousy


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Somatic Marker References

I put together a short bibliography on the Somatic Marker hypothesis from the references in my Zotero collection.

Monday, February 16, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 02/16/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Friday, February 13, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 02/13/2009

  • Of course, it should be noted that there may be alternate architectures that incorporate forward models satisfying criteria for being sensory. However, the core idea of a forward model does not alone satisfy such criteria. It is also worth noting that the characterization of imagery as the willful reactivation of input systems threatens to make the imagery account collapse into a kind of non-sensory view. This is so if a crucial part of a state’s being imagery is its activation of a control signal. (Brain Hammer)

    tags: brains, agency, consciousness, cogsci, grue


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 02/11/2009

  • The technique, called targeted muscle reinnervation, involves taking the nerves that remain after an arm is amputated and connecting them to another muscle in the body, often in the chest. Electrodes are placed over the chest muscles, acting as antennae. When the person wants to move the arm, the brain sends signals that first contract the chest muscles, which send an electrical signal to the prosthetic arm, instructing it to move. The process requires no more conscious effort than it would for a person who has a natural arm. (NYTimes.com)

    tags: brains, cogsci, prosthetics, cyborgs, CDC


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Monday, February 09, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 02/09/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Friday, February 06, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 02/06/2009

  • There is a gap between the mind and the world, and (as far as anybody knows) you need to posit internal representations if you are to have a hope of getting across it. Mind the gap. You’ll regret it if you don’t. (Jerry Fodor review of Clark)

    tags: mind, extended-mind, clark, fodor, cogsci


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

How We Decide: Jonah Lehrer on Colbert

Wednesday, February 04, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 02/04/2009

  • Is there wisdom to be found in repugnance? Or is disgust ‘the nastiest of all emotions’, offering nothing but support to prejudice? Dan Jones looks at the repellant side of human nature.

    tags: disgust, morality, neuroethics, cogsci

  • Dan Jones writes an interesting essay in a recent issue of Science (PDF here) on how work in evolutionary theory, moral philosophy, and neuroscience casts doubt on the idea that disgust embodies a deep-seated wisdom. Instead it provides an emerging portrait of an evolutionarily constrained emotion that is a poor guide to ethical action. (Deric Bownds' MindBlog)

    tags: disgust, morality, neuroethics, cogsci

  • How, and for whom, does disgust influence moral judgment? In 4 experiments participants made moral judgments while experiencing extraneous feelings of disgust. Disgust was induced in Experiment 1 by exposure to a bad smell, in Experiment 2 by working in a disgusting room, in Experiment 3 by recalling a physically disgusting experience, and in Experiment 4 through a video induction. In each case, the results showed that disgust can increase the severity of moral judgments relative to controls. Experiment 4 found that disgust had a different effect on moral judgment than did sadness. In addition, Experiments 2-4 showed that the role of disgust in severity of moral judgments depends on participants’ sensitivity to their own bodily sensations. Taken together, these data indicate the importance - and specificity - of gut feelings in moral judgments.

    tags: disgust, morality, neuroethics, cogsci

  • Our understanding of disgust and morality is in its infancy, yet technological advances in neurobiology, an increasing willingness to engage in interdisciplinary dialogue, to take religion seriously as a dimension of human nature and experience, and growing knowledge of cultural differences, have created a climate within which a breakthrough in our understanding of morality could soon occur. (Heather Looy :: Global Spiral)

    tags: disgust, morality, neuroethics, cogsci

  • The Disgust Scale is a self-report personality scale that was developed by Jonathan Haidt, Clark McCauley, and Paul Rozin as a general tool for the study of disgust. It is used to measure individual differences in sensitivity to disgust, and to examine the relationships among different kinds of disgust. This page contains information on the emotion of disgust and on the Disgust Scale. Please feel free to print any of the papers on this page, and to use the Disgust Scale for research, education, or other non-commercial purposes. If you obtain any interesting findings with the Disgust Scale, we would appreciate hearing about them, and we would be happy to post a link to you or your work on this page.

    tags: disgust, morality, neuroethics, cogsci


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Tuesday, February 03, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 02/03/2009

  • This finding—that having more mature brains did not help the adoptees avoid the toddler-talk stage—suggests that babies speak in baby talk not because they have baby brains, but because they only just got started learning and need time to accrue sufficient vocabulary to be able to expand their conversations. Before long, the one-word stage will give way to the two-word stage, and so on. Learning how to chat like an adult is a gradual process. (Scientific American)

    tags: language, development, 150, cogsci


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Sunday, February 01, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 02/01/2009

  • To understand the role of gestures in the origins of human language, Amy Pollick and Frans de Waal decided to see how they are used by our closest relatives - the chimpanzee and the bonobo. (Not Exactly Rocket Science)

    tags: primates, language, cogsci, evolution

  • there's some suggestive evidence that the brain might contemplate other people very differently when that person is a virtual Facebook "page" and not a flesh and blood individual, with a tangible physical presence. Humans, after all, are social primates, blessed and burdened with a set of paleolithic social instincts. We aren't used to thinking about people as computerized abstractions. (The Frontal Cortex)

    tags: facebook, neuroethics, trolley, social-networking, cogsci

  • What do your dreams mean? Do men and women differ in the nature and intensity of their sexual desires? Can apes learn sign language? Why can’t we tickle ourselves? This course tries to answer these questions and many others, providing a comprehensive overview of the scientific study of thought and behavior. It explores topics such as perception, communication, learning, memory, decision-making, religion, persuasion, love, lust, hunger, art, fiction, and dreams. We will look at how these aspects of the mind develop in children, how they differ across people, how they are wired-up in the brain, and how they break down due to illness and injury. (20 video lectures by Paul Bloom at Yale)

    tags: psychology, lectures, cogsci


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Saturday, January 31, 2009

Look Around You: The Brain

From the BBC series that parodies science videos.

Friday, January 30, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 01/30/2009

  • At the center of the discovery is the signaling of rhodopsin to transducin. Rhodopsin is a pigment in the eye that helps detect light. Transducin is a protein (sometimes called "GPCR") which ultimately signals the brain that light is present. The researchers were able to "freeze frame" the chemical communication between rhodopsin and transducin to study how this takes place and what goes wrong at the molecular level in certain disorders. (Science Blog)

    tags: vision, brains, cogsci


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Thursday, January 29, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 01/29/2009

  • The level of activity in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex correlated with the level of responsibility that the volunteers assigned to the defendant, whereas activity in the amygdala, the medial prefrontal cortex and the posterior cingulate cortex predicted punishment magnitude, indicating that distinct neural systems underlie the two processes in legal decision making. (Deric Bownds' MindBlog)

    tags: punishment, neuroethics, cogsci


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 01/28/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 01/27/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

DecisionMaking References

I pulled together some references from my Zotero collection. Some of these come from my Neuroethics course; most I found with a quick search online recently. The list just scratches the surface, but I do have copies of most if not all of these articles. Let me know if you need something or want to add something.

Decision Making References from Citeline

Monday, January 26, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 01/26/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Sunday, January 25, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 01/25/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Thursday, January 22, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 01/22/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 01/20/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Sunday, January 18, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 01/18/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Sunday, January 11, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 01/11/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Friday, January 09, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 01/09/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Tuesday, January 06, 2009

Cognitive Neuroscience Links 01/06/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Monday, January 05, 2009

Voodoo Correlations


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Saturday, January 26, 2008

Book for Spring Discussion


Our book for this spring's discussion is Joseph LeDoux's The Synaptic Self. For more information about the book go to the Synaptic Self home page.

We'll meet every other Wednesday in SC 200 at noon. Bring you lunch.

Friday, December 28, 2007

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Book Selection for Spring 2008

I put together a list of books we might consider for our discussion in spring 2008. I'm sure I forgot a few that were recommended to me recently, so let me know if there is something you'd like to see on the list that I left off. Please look the list over and get back to me with your favorites (perhaps name a few in rank order). I'll summarize the results sometime in the next two weeks and get back to you.

Friday, October 26, 2007

UC Philosophy Colloquia Fall 2007

FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 2
4-6 PM
Room TBA

Larry Shapiro
Professor of Philosophy, University of Wisconsin

“Making Sense of Mirror Neurons”

Abstract:
Although the question is at least as old as Aristotle, philosophers have said little about how to distinguish one sensory modality from another. Scientists (no offense to Aristotle) have fairly unreflectively assumed distinctions between sensory modalities. Clearly, we need answers to why one sensory modality is distinct from another in order to answer questions such as: How many sensory systems do human beings possess? What would count as evidence that an organism has a sensory system that human beings lack? Do prosthetic sensory systems (e.g. Paul Bach-y-rita's device that uses pressure points on the back or tongue to convey visual information) replicate or only simulate "real" sensory systems? Grice (1962) provided a useful starting point for answers to these questions. Coady, Roxbee Cox, and Heil have said a few things in response to Grice, but not until recently has the issue come alive again (Keeley, Gray, Nudds). In this paper I find fault with various proposals for the individuation of the senses and then provide listeners with the benefit of the correct answer. Perhaps surprisingly, consistent with my account of the senses, mirror neurons turn out to be sensory organs.


FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 9
4-6 PM
Room TBA

Rocco Gennaro
Professor of Philosophy, Indiana State University

“Representational Theories of Consciousness”

Abstract:
Consciousness continues to be one of the most important and perplexing areas of philosophy of mind. One popular philosophical approach to explaining consciousness is known as “representational theories of consciousness.” I'll begin with various definitional and background matters, such as "How is 'conscious' defined?" "What is a mental representation?" and "What is the relationship between consciousness and intentionality?" I will then discuss motivations for and varieties of representational theories. Such theories have in common the idea that conscious mental states can be explained in terms of representational (or intentional) relations and are generally
reductionistic in spirit. For example, the representationalist will typically hold that the phenomenal properties of experience (i.e. qualia) can be explained in terms of the experiences’ representational properties (or content). The central question to be answered is: What makes a mental state a conscious mental state? This talk will critically review a number of prominent representational theories, including first-order theories (e.g. Michael Tye), higher-order thought theory (e.g. David Rosenthal), the higher-order perception model (e.g. Bill Lycan), as well as self-representational approaches to consciousness. Thus, various representational theories will be explained and criticisms of each will be discussed. I also present my own preferred version of HOT theory.


FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 30
4-6 PM
Room TBA

Valerie Hardcastle
Professor of Philosophy and Dean of the McMicken College of Arts and Sciences, University of Cincinnati

“Reduction, Emergence, and Complexity: The Case of Obesity”

Abstract
Reductionists and emergentists both assume that reality is hierarchically organized by part-whole relations. The real difference between the two ontological views turns on the notion of downward causation. In this presentation, I argue that neither approach, as traditionally understood, fits well with the latest experimental and theoretical advances in science. I illustrate this claim by looking at our current understanding of obesity
as an example.

Thursday, September 06, 2007

Blumberg Discussions

This fall semester we will be discussing Mark Blumberg's book Basic Instinct. [Amazon] We'll every other Monday from noon to 1:00 in SC 200. Mark the following dates on your calendar:

September 17
October 1
October 22
November 5
November 19
December 3

Sunday, August 26, 2007

Fall 2007 books

Here are some candidates for our reading group this semester.

Making up the Mind: How the Brain Creates Our Mental World, by Chris Frith (Blackwell, 2007). [Amazon, $24.95]
Inside your head there is an amazing labor-saving device; more effective than the latest high-tech computer. Your brain frees you from the everyday tasks of moving about in the world around you, allowing you to concentrate on the things that are important to you: making friends and influencing people. However, the 'you' that is released into this social world is also a construction of your brain. It is your brain that enables you to share your mental life with the people around you. Making up the Mind is the first accessible account of experimental studies showing how the brain creates our mental world. Using evidence from brain imaging, psychological experiments, and studies with patients, Chris Frith, one of the world's leading neuroscientists, explores the relationship between the mind and the brain.

How the Body Shapes the Mind, by Shaun Gallagher (Oxford, 2006). [Amazon, $25.45]
How the Body Shapes the Mind is an interdisciplinary work that addresses philosophical questions by appealing to evidence found in experimental psychology, neuroscience, studies of pathologies, and developmental psychology. There is a growing consensus across these disciplines that the contribution of embodiment to cognition is inescapable. Because this insight has been developed across a variety of disciplines, however, there is still a need to develop a common vocabulary that is capable of integrating discussions of brain mechanisms in neuroscience, behavioural expressions in psychology, design concerns in artificial intelligence and robotics, and debates about embodied experience in the phenomenology and philosophy of mind. Shaun Gallagher's book aims to contribute to the formulation of that common vocabulary and to develop a conceptual framework that will avoid both the overly reductionistic approaches that explain everything in terms of bottom-up neuronal mechanisms, and inflationistic approaches that explain everything in terms of Cartesian, top-down cognitive states. Gallagher pursues two basic sets of questions. The first set consists of questions about the phenomenal aspects of the structure of experience, and specifically the relatively regular and constant features that we find in the content of our experience. If throughout conscious experience there is a constant reference to one's own body, even if this is a recessive or marginal awareness, then that reference constitutes a structural feature of the phenomenal field of consciousness, part of a framework that is likely to determine or influence all other aspects of experience. The second set of questions concerns aspects of the structure of experience that are more hidden, those that may be more difficult to get at because they happen before we know it. They do not normally enter into the content of experience in an explicit way, and are often inaccessible to reflective consciousness. To what extent, and in what ways, are consciousness and cognitive processes, which include experiences related to perception, memory, imagination, belief, judgement, and so forth, shaped or structured by the fact that they are embodied in this way?

Why Choose This Book?: How We Make Decisions, by Read Montegue (Dutton Adult, 2006). [Amazon, $16.47]
Why do we choose chocolate ice cream over vanilla ice cream? Why do we select one lover rather than another? Baylor University neuroscientist Montague (now a fellow at Princeton's Institute for Advanced Study) deftly marries psychology and neuroscience as he probes how we make choices. On one hand, decision making boils down to simple computation. Montague argues that our brains are efficient computational machines. But unlike computers, our brains fix on the goals of survival and reproduction, realizing that every hasty decision can be costly to the survival of the species. Our brains also harbor experiences (memories) that foster the choices we make. On the other hand, we can make choices that go against survival: for instance, we can choose to die for an idea. Why is that? Because, says Montague, human computations involve valuation, choosing between one value and another, requiring computation of cultural and psychological qualities. Although the notion of the brain as a computational machine can be traced at least as far back as Descartes, Montague adds new ideas to our understanding of how our brains compute. But his sometimes engaging and sometimes plodding book doesn't always explain the complex science for general readers.

Neuroethics: Challenges for the 21st Century, by Neil Levy (Cambridge,, 2007). [Amazon $34.65]
Neuroscience has dramatically increased understanding of how mental states and processes are realized by the brain, thus opening doors for treating the multitude of ways in which minds become dysfunctional. This book explores questions such as when is it permissible to alter a person's memories, influence personality traits or read minds? What can neuroscience tell us about free will, self-control, self-deception and the foundations of morality? The view of neuroethics offered here argues that many of our new powers to read ,alter and control minds are not entirely unparalleled with older ones. They have, however, expanded to include almost all our social, political and ethical decisions. Written primarily for graduate students, this book will appeal to anyone with an interest in the more philosophical and ethical aspects of the neurosciences.

Basic Instinct: The Genesis of Behavior, by Mark Blumberg (Thunder's Mouth, 2006) [Amazon, $11.66]
This is a passionate (and at times polemical) survey of what contemporary neuroscience has to say about the nature of instinct. Actually, as it turns out, it might be more accurate to say the "nurture" of instinct, since Blumberg firmly argues against the perspective that what we think of as instincts are innate—he reframes "instincts," ranging from a baby's tendency to mimic faces to monkeys' fear of snakes, as a consequence of reflexes rather than innate knowledge. Though initially a bit dense with scientific jargon, the book picks up midway through, and the then generally accessible prose skillfully unpacks behaviors that seem instinctive, ranging from the mundane (getting thirsty) to the astonishing (androgenital licking in newborn rats). The writing is as persuasive as it is rich in intriguing detail, and a reader may well find that, by the end of the book, the word "nativism" (the perspective that animals and humans are born with cognitive instincts in place, which Blumberg at one point calls "an intellectual and experimental red herring") has become a dirty word.

Friday, June 22, 2007

The Amygdaloids

The Amygdaloids (with neuroscientist Joe LeDoux) play for the NYU graduation at Madison Square Garden.

Tuesday, June 19, 2007

Sapolsky on Stress

Robert Sapolsky talks about 'Stress, Neurodegeneration and Individual Differences.'



From Google Video

Monday, June 18, 2007

From Animal to Person

In this podcast Dan Dennett speaks speaks to the New York Academy of Sciences about the evolution of human culture. (From Science & the City)

Wednesday, April 25, 2007

Summer Book Suggestions

Below are three candidates for our summer reading group. Let me know if there are other suggestions. I'll post a survey soon with which we can select a book and a meeting time.

Basic Instinct: The Genesis of Behavior (Blumberg) [Amazon, $11.66]
This is a passionate (and at times polemical) survey of what contemporary neuroscience has to say about the nature of instinct. Actually, as it turns out, it might be more accurate to say the "nurture" of instinct, since Blumberg firmly argues against the perspective that what we think of as instincts are innate—he reframes "instincts," ranging from a baby's tendency to mimic faces to monkeys' fear of snakes, as a consequence of reflexes rather than innate knowledge. Though initially a bit dense with scientific jargon, the book picks up midway through, and the then generally accessible prose skillfully unpacks behaviors that seem instinctive, ranging from the mundane (getting thirsty) to the astonishing (androgenital licking in newborn rats). The writing is as persuasive as it is rich in intriguing detail, and a reader may well find that, by the end of the book, the word "nativism" (the perspective that animals and humans are born with cognitive instincts in place, which Blumberg at one point calls "an intellectual and experimental red herring") has become a dirty word.

Why Choose This Book?: How We Make Decisions (Read Montague) [Amazon, $16.47]
From Publishers Weekly:
Why do we choose chocolate ice cream over vanilla ice cream? Why do we select one lover rather than another? Baylor University neuroscientist Montague (now a fellow at Princeton's Institute for Advanced Study) deftly marries psychology and neuroscience as he probes how we make choices. On one hand, decision making boils down to simple computation. Montague argues that our brains are efficient computational machines. But unlike computers, our brains fix on the goals of survival and reproduction, realizing that every hasty decision can be costly to the survival of the species. Our brains also harbor experiences (memories) that foster the choices we make. On the other hand, we can make choices that go against survival: for instance, we can choose to die for an idea. Why is that? Because, says Montague, human computations involve valuation, choosing between one value and another, requiring computation of cultural and psychological qualities. Although the notion of the brain as a computational machine can be traced at least as far back as Descartes, Montague adds new ideas to our understanding of how our brains compute. But his sometimes engaging and sometimes plodding book doesn't always explain the complex science for general readers. (Nov.)

Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution (Peter J. Richerson, Robert Boyd) [Amazon, $19.00]
Humans are a striking anomaly in the natural world. While we are similar to other mammals in many ways, our behavior sets us apart. Our unparalleled ability to adapt has allowed us to occupy virtually every habitat on earth using an incredible variety of tools and subsistence techniques. Our societies are larger, more complex, and more cooperative than any other mammal's. In this stunning exploration of human adaptation, Peter J. Richerson and Robert Boyd argue that only a Darwinian theory of cultural evolution can explain these unique characteristics.

Not by Genes Alone offers a radical interpretation of human evolution, arguing that our ecological dominance and our singular social systems stem from a psychology uniquely adapted to create complex culture. Richerson and Boyd illustrate here that culture is neither superorganic nor the handmaiden of the genes. Rather, it is essential to human adaptation, as much a part of human biology as bipedal locomotion. Drawing on work in the fields of anthropology, political science, sociology, and economics—and building their case with such fascinating examples as kayaks, corporations, clever knots, and yams that require twelve men to carry them—Richerson and Boyd convincingly demonstrate that culture and biology are inextricably linked, and they show us how to think about their interaction in a way that yields a richer understanding of human nature.

In abandoning the nature-versus-nurture debate as fundamentally misconceived, Not by Genes Alone is a truly original and groundbreaking theory of the role of culture in evolution and a book to be reckoned with for generations to come.